Huawei should be completely banned from supplying 5G mobile networks in the UK because its operations are “subject to influence by the Chinese state”, according to a report by a Conservative MP and two academics.
They argue that a decision announced by Theresa May last month, following a fraught meeting of the National Security Council (NSC), to allow the company to supply “non-core” equipment should be overturned because using the company’s technology presents “risks”.
In a report from the Henry Jackson Society (HJS), the authors go on to claim Huawei “has long been accused of espionage” – a claim denied repeatedly by the firm – and notes that “while there are no definitely proven cases”, a precautionary principle should be adopted.
Huawei ‘prepared to sign no-spy agreement with UK government’
The document is co-authored by the Tory MP Bob Seely, who has already raised concerns about Huawei, and the expert academics Peter Varnish and John Hemmings. It adds to pressure heaped on the British government to reconsider letting Huawei participate in the UK’s 5G network from the US and Australia, whose intelligence agencies share information with the UK.
Last month May provisionally approved the use of Huawei technology for parts of the UK’s future 5G telecoms networks after a meeting of the NSC. A leaked account of the meeting said five cabinet ministers raised concerns about the company.
The HJS report has a foreword by Sir Richard Dearlove, who led MI6 between 1999 and 2004. Using blunter language than the report’s authors, he wrote: “I very much hope there is time for the UK Government … to reconsider the Huawei decision.
“No part of the Communist Chinese state is ultimately able to operate free of the control exercised by its Communist Party leadership,” Dearlove added. “Therefore, we must conclude the engagement of Huawei presents a potential security risk to the UK.”
Huawei says it has never engaged in espionage or allowed its technology to be knowingly hacked by the Chinese state. Earlier this week, its chairman, Liang Hua, said the company would be prepared to sign a “no-spy agreement” during a visit to the UK. Its founder, Ren Zhengfei, has said he would rather shut the company down than be ordered to conduct any surveillance on behalf of the Chinese state.
The HJS report notes countries such as the US and Australia have categorised Huawei as a “high-risk vendor”. Malcolm Turnbull, the former prime minister of Australia, also endorsing the report, said he had ordered a ban on Huawei in 5G networks because the risks of using its kit “cannot be effectively mitigated, you can’t design a way around it”.
British intelligence agencies have broadly argued the risks from using Huawei technology can be contained and an arm of the UK’s GCHQ has been monitoring and examining the company’s software and technology for back doors and vulnerabilities since the middle of the last decade.
No evidence of hacking has been made public, and the agencies are understood to have advised Theresa May and the NSA that any risks in using Huawei kit can be contained through a limited deployment.
However, five ministers raised concerns about the decision at the NSA meeting. One, Gavin Williamson, then the defence secretary, was fired by the prime minister for leaking details about the deliberations of the meeting, which prompted some Tory MPs to demand the UK decision be overturned.
Meanwhile, the Dutch intelligence service is investigating whether Huawei is involved in espionage for the Chinese state in the Netherlands, the newspaper De Volkskrant reported on Thursday.
Citing intelligence sources, the paper said the General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) was probing a possible hidden “back door” into customer data belonging to one of the Netherlands’ three major telecomms providers: VodafoneZiggo, T-Mobile/Tele2 or KPN.
The paper said the AIVD had declined to confirm or deny the information and the three networks either refused to comment or said they were not aware of the investigation. A Huawei spokesman told the paper the firm abided by the laws and regulations of every country in which it operates and protected customer privacy.
Why is Huawei controversial?
Huawei is a Chinese telecoms company founded in 1987. Politicians in the US have alleged that Huawei’s forthcoming 5G mobile phone networks could be hacked by Chinese spies to eavesdrop on sensitive phone calls and gain access to counter-terrorist operations. Allies who allow Huawei technology inside their 5G networks have been told they may be frozen out of US intelligence sharing. Australia, New Zealand and Japan have banned Huawei from their 5G networks.
In the UK, BT has excluded Huawei telecoms infrastructure from its own 5G rollout and removed some of its equipment from the 4G network. In January 2019 Vodafone said it had decided to ‘pause’ the use of Huawei equipment in its core networks across Europe. The UK’s defence secretary Gavin Williamson was sacked by prime minister Theresa May after a leak revealed the sensitive decision that the UK would not be totally banning Huawei from 5G projects.
Poland’s internal affairs minister, Joachim Brudziński, has called for the European Union and Nato to work on a joint position over whether to exclude Huawei from their markets, after an Huawei employee was arrested on spying charges.
Much of the doubt surrounding Huawei stems from founder Ren Zhengfei’s background in China’s People’s Liberation Army between 1974 and 1983, where he was an engineer. His daughter, Huawei’s senior executive Meng Wanzhou, was arrested in Canada in December 2018 over allegations of Iran-sanctions violations, and she awaits extradition to the US. Ren, referring to trade issues between the US and China, says the company is ‘like a small sesame seed, stuck in the middle of conflict between two great powers’.
Several Dutch operators use Huawei hardware and software in their mobile networks and Bart Jacobs, a professor of computer security at Radboud University, in Nijmegen, told De Volkskrant the discovery of a “back door” to customer data sounded “like a smoking gun with possible geopolitical consequences”.
The Dutch government is aiming to make a decision within the next two weeks whether or not to award contracts for parts of the Netherlands’ new 5G mobile network to Huawei, which is substantially cheaper than its rival bidders.
The paper said it had seen a copy of a joint report by the AIVD and the Dutch military intelligence service, MIVD, recommending it would be “undesirable” for the Netherlands to make itself dependent on IT products and services from countries that have been determined to conduct “offensive cyber programmes against Dutch interests”.
This content was originally published here.